Perceived stigma toward mental health consumers does not influence willingness to seek mental health care nor psychiatry as a top residency choice among psychiatrically-minded 1st and 4th year medical students
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: The relationship between 1st and 4th year medical students’ perceptions of mental illness stigma, their willingness to seek professional help for a mental health problem and their choice of psychiatry as a residency was assessed. Method: The survey was completed online, using well-established self-report inventories. Results: It appears that respondents with an interest in psychiatry have an accurate appraisal of the stigma experienced by those with a mental illness, and that this understanding develops independent of the knowledge and experience gained during their medical education. Perception of stigma had no influence on students’ helpseeking orientation. Finally, medical students appear to develop an interest in psychiatry before their exposure to the specialty in the medical program. Conclusion: The stigma surrounding mental illness is not a barrier to seeking mental health care among this group of medical students. The results of the present study are discussed and evaluated in the context of the study’s limitations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it