Cell‐free collagen type I matrix for repair of cartilage defects—clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Several well-described techniques are available for the treatment of chondral and osteochondral defects. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of a single-stage procedure incorporating a new cell-free collagen type I gel for the treatment of small chondral and osteochondral defects in the knee evaluated at 2-year follow-up. METHODS: Fifteen patients were treated with a cell-free collagen type I gel matrix of 11 mm diameter. The grafts were implanted in the debrided cartilage defect and fixed by press-fit only. The clinical outcome was assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks, and 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner activity scale and visual analogue scale (VAS). Graft attachment rate was assessed 6 weeks postoperatively using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Cartilage regeneration was evaluated using the Magnetic Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score at 6, 12 and 24 months after implantation. Clinical results were correlated with MRI findings. RESULTS: Six male and nine female patients were included in this study, with a mean age of 26 (range: 19-40). No complications were reported. The mean VAS values after 6 weeks and the mean IKDC patient values after 6 months were significantly improved from the preoperative values (P = 0.005 and P = 0.009, respectively). This improvement remained up to the latest follow-up. There were no significant differences between the median preoperative and postoperative Tegner values (n.s.). Significant improvement of the mean MOCART score was observed after 12 months and remained by 24 months (P < 0.001). MR images showed that in 14 of the 15 patients, the graft was completely attached by 6 weeks postoperatively. At 24 months after implantation, MRI demonstrated complete filling in all cases with a mainly smooth surface, complete integration of the border zone, homogenous structure of the repaired tissue and nearly normal signal intensity. No correlation between any variables of the MOCART score and the clinical scores was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The present study reveals that the new method produces both good clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results. Use of press-fit only implanted grafts of a smaller diameter leads to a high attachment rate at 24-month follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".