MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000174315 · doi:10.1007/s00167-011-1777-5

Cell‐free collagen type I matrix for repair of cartilage defects—clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results

2011· article· en· W2000174315 on OpenAlexaff
Turgay Efe, Christina Theisen, Susanne Fuchs‐Winkelmann, Thomas Stein, Alan Getgood, Marga B. Rominger, Jürgen R. J. Paletta, Markus D. Schofer

Bibliographic record

VenueKnee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsFowler Kennedy Sport Medicine ClinicWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingCartilageSurgeryVisual analogue scaleRadiologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Several well-described techniques are available for the treatment of chondral and osteochondral defects. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of a single-stage procedure incorporating a new cell-free collagen type I gel for the treatment of small chondral and osteochondral defects in the knee evaluated at 2-year follow-up. METHODS: Fifteen patients were treated with a cell-free collagen type I gel matrix of 11 mm diameter. The grafts were implanted in the debrided cartilage defect and fixed by press-fit only. The clinical outcome was assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks, and 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner activity scale and visual analogue scale (VAS). Graft attachment rate was assessed 6 weeks postoperatively using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Cartilage regeneration was evaluated using the Magnetic Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score at 6, 12 and 24 months after implantation. Clinical results were correlated with MRI findings. RESULTS: Six male and nine female patients were included in this study, with a mean age of 26 (range: 19-40). No complications were reported. The mean VAS values after 6 weeks and the mean IKDC patient values after 6 months were significantly improved from the preoperative values (P = 0.005 and P = 0.009, respectively). This improvement remained up to the latest follow-up. There were no significant differences between the median preoperative and postoperative Tegner values (n.s.). Significant improvement of the mean MOCART score was observed after 12 months and remained by 24 months (P < 0.001). MR images showed that in 14 of the 15 patients, the graft was completely attached by 6 weeks postoperatively. At 24 months after implantation, MRI demonstrated complete filling in all cases with a mainly smooth surface, complete integration of the border zone, homogenous structure of the repaired tissue and nearly normal signal intensity. No correlation between any variables of the MOCART score and the clinical scores was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The present study reveals that the new method produces both good clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results. Use of press-fit only implanted grafts of a smaller diameter leads to a high attachment rate at 24-month follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations106
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnee Surgery Sports Traumatology ArthroscopySame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207