Adducts of <i>meso</i> and racemic 5,5,7,12,12,14-hexamethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane with trigonally trisubstituted benzene carboxylic acids: supramolecular structures in one and two dimensions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The meso and racemic forms of 5,5,7,12,12,14-hexamethyl-1,4,8, 11-tetraazacyclotetradecane, C(16)H(36)N(4) (tet-a and tet-b, respectively), form adducts with trigonally trisubstituted benzene carboxylic acids; tet-a-3,5-dinitrobenzoic acid (1/2) (1), tet-a-5-hydroxyisophthalic acid-water (1/1/1) (3) and tet-b-5-hydroxyisophthalic acid-water (1/1/1) (4) are all salts, [C(16)H(38)N(4)](2+).2[C(7)H(3)N(2)O(6)](-) (1) and [C(16)H(38)N(4)](2+).[C(8)H(4)O(5)](2-).H(2)O (3) and (4). The conformations of the [(tet-a)H(2)](2+) and [(tet-b)H(2)](2+) cations are entirely different: [(tet-a)H(2)](2+) is precisely centrosymmetric in (1) and approximately so in (3), while [(tet-b)H(2)](2+) has approximate C(2) symmetry in (4). In each salt the cation forms two intramolecular N-H.N and four intermolecular N-H.O hydrogen bonds. In (1) the supramolecular structure is one-dimensional, a C(2)(2)(13)[R(2)(4)(16)] chain of rings. Compounds (3) and (4) crystallize in space groups P2(1)2(1)2(1) and P2(1)/c, respectively, but the supramolecular structures are very similar: in each, the anions and the water molecules form a C(7)[R(3)(3)(13)] chain of rings, generated in (3) by a 2(1) axis and in (4) by a glide plane. These chains are linked, in both (3) and (4), by cations to form sheets. Adjacent meso cations in (3) are related by a 2(1) axis and adjacent chiral cations in (4) are related by a glide plane.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".