Multi-reference state-universal coupled-cluster approaches to electronically excited states
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The multi-reference (MR), general model space (GMS), state-universal (SU), coupled-cluster (CC) method with singles and doubles (GMS-SU-CCSD), as well as its triple-corrected versions GMS-SU-CCSD(T), are employed to assess their ability to describe low-lying excited states of various molecules, with an emphasis on a simultaneous handling of several states of the same symmetry species. A special attention is given to the role of the so-called C-conditions that account for non-vanishing internal cluster amplitudes when relying on an incomplete GMS, as well as to the choice of suitable model spaces and a perturbative account of secondary triples. The ambiguities arising when using large basis sets are also pointed out. To achieve a general assessment of the potential of the GMS-type SU-CC approaches, the vertical excitation energies of several species, including the challenging BN diatomic as well as larger systems, namely formaldehyde, trans-butadiene, formamide, and benzene are considered. These results are compared with those provided by the equation-of-motion EOM-CCSD method and, whenever available, the density functional theory results and experimental data. These comparisons clearly demonstrate the usefulness of GMS-type MR-CC approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".