Identification of Two Domains Involved in the Assembly of Transient Receptor Potential Canonical Channels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transient receptor potential canonical (TRPC) channels are associated with calcium entry activity in nonexcitable cells. TRPCs can form homo- or heterotetrameric channels, in which case they can assemble together within a subfamily groups. TRPC1, 4, and 5 represent one group, and TRPC3, 6, and 7 represent the other. The molecular determinants involved in promoting subunit tetramerization are not known. To identify them, we generated chimeras by swapping the different domains of TRPC4 with the same regions in TRPC6. We showed that TRPC4 coimmunoprecipitated with the chimeras containing the ankyrin repeats and coiled-coil domains of TRPC4 into TRPC6. However, chimeras containing only the ankyrin repeats or only the coiled-coil domain of TRPC4 did not coimmunoprecipitate with TRPC4. We also showed that a second domain of interaction composed of the pore region and the C-terminal tail is involved in the oligomerization of TRPC4. However, chimeras containing only the pore region or only the C-terminal tail of TRPC4 did not coimmunoprecipitate with TRPC4. Furthermore, we showed that the N terminus of TRPC6 coimmunoprecipitated with the C terminus of TRPC6. Overexpression in HEK293T cells of chimeras that contained an N terminus and a C terminus from different subfamily groups increased intracellular calcium entry subsequent to stimulation of G(q) protein-coupled receptors. These results suggest that two types of interactions are involved in the assembly of the four subunits of the TRPC channel. The first interaction occurs between the N termini and involves two regions. The second interaction occurs between the N terminus and the C terminus and does not appear to be necessary for the activity of TRPCs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".