Two-Phase Cooling Characteristics of Mono-Dispersed Droplets Impacted on a Heated Surface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Droplet impact cooling has been shown to be a promising method for high heat flux removal applications. Recent experimental studies have revealed that even higher heat transfer at low mass fluxes and low Weber number can be achieved with only few degrees of superheat. In the present work, mono-dispersed droplet cooling of a horizontal upward facing heated surface was investigated at low Weber numbers. The impact velocity and frequency of free falling stream of droplets were varied dependently through changing the gap between the heated surface and tip of different capillaries and variation of volumetric flow rate (0.5–4.7 cc/min).The range of impact velocity and droplet frequency was ranged between 0.28 to 1.3 m/s and 0.5 Hz to 5 Hz, respectively using different capillaries size between 17g to 22g. The coolant was 25°C deionized water and all the experiments were performed at atmospheric pressure. The time-averaged two-phase characteristic curves were obtained up to Critical Heat Flux (CHF)-regime. Through the extensive set of experiments, two separate correlations are proposed to predict the average CHFs based on the Weber between 3
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".