MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000335266 · doi:10.1002/mrm.22300

Independent estimation of<i>T</i>*<sub>2</sub>for water and fat for improved accuracy of fat quantification

2010· article· en· W2000335266 on OpenAlexaff
Venkata V. Chebrolu, Catherine D. G. Hines, Huanzhou Yu, Angel R. Pineda, Ann Shimakawa, Charles A. McKenzie, Alexey Samsonov, Jean H. Brittain, Scott B. Reeder

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin, MadisonNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsSteatosisNonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseImaging phantomConfoundingFatty liverFat accumulationGrading (engineering)MathematicsAdipose tissueMedicineChemistryNuclear medicineStatisticsDiseaseInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Noninvasive biomarkers of intracellular accumulation of fat within the liver (hepatic steatosis) are urgently needed for detection and quantitative grading of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, the most common cause of chronic liver disease in the United States. Accurate quantification of fat with MRI is challenging due the presence of several confounding factors, including T*(2) decay. The specific purpose of this work is to quantify the impact of T*(2) decay and develop a multiexponential T*(2) correction method for improved accuracy of fat quantification, relaxing assumptions made by previous T*(2) correction methods. A modified Gauss-Newton algorithm is used to estimate the T*(2) for water and fat independently. Improved quantification of fat is demonstrated, with independent estimation of T*(2) for water and fat using phantom experiments. The tradeoffs in algorithm stability and accuracy between multiexponential and single exponential techniques are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations91
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagnetic Resonance in MedicineSame topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207