New Hormonal Therapy in Prostate Cancer: Combined Use of a Pure Antiandrogen and an LHRH Agonist
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Treatment with an LHRH agonist (HOE-766) alone causes an almost complete blockage of testicular testosterone formation in rat and man. In order to neutralize androgens of adrenal origin, a pure antiandrogen (RU-23908) was given in combination with the LHRH agonist in the rat. At doses where each drug has no or minimal effect alone, prostate and seminal vesicle weight were reduced to 9 and 15% of control after 5 months of combined treatment, respectively. Among the species studied, man is the most sensitive to the inhibitory effect of treatment with LHRH agonists on testicular steroidogenesis. Near castration levels of serum testosterone and 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone are obtained within 1-2 weeks of daily subcutaneous administration of the LHRH agonist [D-Ser(tbu)6, des-Gly-NH2(10)]LHRH ethylamide (HOE-766) in adult men with cancer of prostate. The decrease in serum androgen levels is accompanied by objective remission of the cancer in approximately 75% of cases. In a preliminary study where the LHRH agonist was administered in combination with the pure antiandrogen RU-23908, it was shown that the antiandrogen does not interfere with the LHRH-induced inhibition of serum androgen levels. The ease of application of this new form of hormonal therapy should permit its use at early stages of the disease and thus reduce the development of metastases and androgen-resistant cell clones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it