MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cooperation between CD4 T helper cells is required for the generation of alloantigen‐specific, IFN‐γ‐producing human CD4 T cells

2005· article· en· W2000376208 on OpenAlexafffund
Tara M. Strutt, Peter A. Bretscher

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunology and Cell Biology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Blood Services
KeywordsCD8ImmunologyT cellIn vitroCytotoxic T cellInterleukin 21AntigenCd4 t cellAntigen-presenting cellMolecular biologyBiologyCell biologyImmune systemBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have used MLR to assess the cell interactions that enable human PBL stimulated with irradiated, allogeneic PBL to give rise to allospecific, IFN-gamma-producing CD4 T cells. We were able to generate alloantigen-specific, IFN-gamma-producing T cells from peripheral blood. The responder and stimulator cell numbers required for the optimal generation of such cells, enumerated using an enzyme-linked immunospot assay, were separately determined for various combinations of responders and stimulators. The number of antigen-specific, IFN-gamma-producing cells generated per 10(6) responder cells, seeded at the initiation of culture, is critically dependent on the density of the responder cells, with minimal generation of IFN-gamma-producing T cells at low responder densities. These and further observations with fractionated responding PBL show that CD4 T-cell/CD4 T-cell interactions, which are completely independent of CD8() T cells, are necessary for the in vitro generation of alloantigen-specific, IFN-gamma-producing CD4 T cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmunology and Cell BiologySame topicT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyFrench-language works237,207