The Effect of through-Thickness Texture Inhomogeneity on Roping Behavior in AA6111 Al-Si-Mg Alloy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The through-thickness textures of different variants of AA6111 T4 sheets were investigated by using X-ray pole figure technique, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and electron back scattering diffraction (EBSD) technique in SEM. The roping behaviors of the sheets were determined and corelated to the through-thickness texture inhomogeneity. It has been demonstrated that (i) roping is due to through-thickness texture inhomogeneity, (ii) roping occurs in AA6111 when the cube and Goss texture components segregate along the rolling direction (RD) and alternate in the transverse direction (TD), (iii) the texture alignment from sheet surface to 1/5 thickness is most critical to roping behavior, while the effect of texture in the sheet centre is masked by the surface layer, and (iv) the texture alignment can be attributed to the stability of cube and Goss in rolling, and the nucleation and grain growth advantage of cube and Goss during heat treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".