MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000403080 · doi:10.1159/000138092

Effect of Reduced Calcium on Lysophosphatidylcholine-Induced Cardiac Arrhythmias

2008· article· en· W2000403080 on OpenAlexaff
Ricky Y.K. Man, Cindy L. Lederman

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVerapamilLysophosphatidylcholineVentricular fibrillationCalciumFibrillationInternal medicinePerfusionWashoutCardiologyMedicineAortaBepridilChemistryAtrial fibrillationPhosphatidylcholinePhospholipidBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) had recently been shown to accumulate in the ischemic heart and was demonstrated to be arrhythmogenic in perfused hearts. The present study was designed to examine the effects of calcium and verapamil on LPC-induced arrhythmias. Rat hearts were perfused through the aorta with oxygenated Krebs-Henseleit buffer at 37 degrees C. The occurrence of ventricular fibrillation was dependent on the LPC concentration and perfusion time. In subsequent experiments, each heart was perfused with a buffer containing 20 microM LPC for 3 min and was followed with a 10 min washout period. Ventricular fibrillation occurred in all 8 control experiments. When the Ca2+ concentration was reduced to half, only 3 out of 8 hearts fibrillated. In the presence of 0.2 mg/1 of verapamil, 7 out of 9 hearts fibrillated, and the time to fibrillation was not increased significantly by verapamil. These results suggest that calcium may be important in LPC-induced arrhythmias, and this effect is not significantly attenuated by the Ca2+ antagonist, verapamil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.928

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacologySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207