MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000500138 · doi:10.1139/v01-034

Chiral metallocenes: the synthesis and X-ray crystal structures of TiCl<sub>2</sub>η<sup>5</sup>:η<sup>5</sup>-C<sub>5</sub>Me<sub>4</sub>SiMe<sub>2</sub>C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>3</sub>R<sup>*</sup>) (R<sup>* </sup>= menthyl or neomenthyl) and related compounds

2001· article· en· W2000500138 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Paul Beagley, Philip Davies, Harry Adams, Colin White

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsDiastereomerChemistryMonoclinic crystal systemOrthorhombic crystal systemCyclopentadienyl complexCrystal structureCrystallographyStereospecificityStereochemistryMetalloceneRacemic mixtureEnantiomerPolymerizationOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The syntheses of the chiral ansa-metallocene complexes TiCl2(η5:η5-C5Me4SiMe2C5H3R*) (R* = menthyl (4a) or neomenthyl (4b)) are reported; initially 4a was obtained as a 3:1 mixture of (R:S) diastereoisomers, which differ only in which face of the asymmetrically substituted cyclopentadienyl ring is bonded to the titanium (chiral descriptor shown). The major diastereomer 4aR was crystallized out optically pure from the initial reaction mixture, whereas the 4aS diastereoisomer was isolated after isomerizing a racemic mixture of 4a to a 1:3 mixture of (R:S) diastereoisomers using UV irradiation. The corresponding neomenthyl complex 4b was obtained as a 1.3:1 mixture of diastereoisomers that could not be separated. The optically pure 4aR was converted stereoselectively into the corresponding (R)-TiMe2(η5:η5-C5Me4SiMe2C5H3R*) (R* = menthyl). Syntheses of the related indenyl ligand system C5Me4SiMe2C9H7 (3) is reported but complexation to titanium proved to be problematic although ZrCl2(η5:η5-C5Me4SiMe2C9H6) (6) was isolated. The crystal structures of both 4aR and 4aS are reported and compared. Crystals of 4aR are orthorhombic, a = 27.857(11), b = 9.985(5), and c = 9.596(4) Å, Z = 4, space group P212121 (D24, No. 19), and those of 4aS are monoclinic, a = 8.5810(10), b = 38.679(4), and c = 8.5842(10) Å, β = 113.001(2)°, Z = 4, space group P21 (C22, No. 4). The structures were solved by the Patterson method and 4aR was refined by blocked-cascade least-squares procedures to R = 0.0628 (Rω = 0.0503) for 902 reflections with |F|/σ(|F|) [Formula: see text] 3.0, whereas 4aS was refined by full-matrix least-squares procedures to R = 0.0646 (wR2 = 0.1829) for 5734 reflections with |F|/σ(|F|) [Formula: see text] 4.0. Both diastereomers of 4a catalyze hydrosilylation of ketones, but as expected from a comparison of the two crystal structures, the 4aR isomer is the more stereoselective catalyst, i.e., hydrosilylation of acetophenone followed by hydrolysis gives 82% enantiomeric excess (ee) of (S)-PhCH(Me)OH with 4aR whereas only 16% ee of (R)-PhCH(Me)OH with 4aS.Key words: titanium, metallocene, chiral, structure, catalyst.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207