MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000500823 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2011.6133500

Hierarchical Approach for Efficient Virtual Network Embedding Based on Exact Subgraph Matching

2011· article· en· W2000500823 on OpenAlexaff
T. Ghazar, Nancy Samaan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalabilityComputer scienceBottleneckEmbeddingDistributed computingHeuristicOverhead (engineering)Matching (statistics)Network topologyScheme (mathematics)Theoretical computer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)Computer networkMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The virtual network (VN) embedding problem is concerned with mapping the nodes and links of a VN request to a shared substrate network while maximizing some objective function such as maximizing profit or resource utilization. This mapping must satisfy specific node capacity and link bandwidth requirements. This paper presents a novel hierarchical approach for scalable VN embedding that achieves a balance between centralized schemes that have a network-wide view of available resources but represent a management bottleneck and scalable distributed ones that incur a high message overhead. The contribution of this work is two fold; we introduce a novel hierarchical substrate management framework that finds more than one candidate VN mapping in parallel, thus, increasing the chances of finding an optimal mapping. The second contribution is a novel VN mapping scheme that recasts the VN mapping problem as a subgraph matching one using modified graph-powers, and introduces a simple heuristic matching scheme to find an efficient VN mapping. In contrast to existing solutions, the proposed framework does not impose any limitations on the size or topology of the VN request, rather the search is tailored based on the VN size. Experimental results demonstrate the performance of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score0.744

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207