MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000549082 · doi:10.1080/15222055.2014.886648

Size and ATP Content of Unfertilized Eggs from Farmed and Wild Atlantic Salmon in Newfoundland

2014· article· en· W2000549082 on OpenAlexafffundabout
L. Lush, Kimberley Burt, Dounia Hamoutene, Nancy Camarillo‐Sepulveda, Juan C. Pérez-Casanova, Sharon Kenny, Pierre Goulet, R. Hinks, Clyde Collier

Bibliographic record

VenueNorth American Journal of Aquaculture · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Newfoundland and LabradorAssembly of First NationsFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaMemorial University of NewfoundlandMarine Institute
KeywordsSalmoBiologyContext (archaeology)FisheryHuman fertilizationAquacultureAnimal scienceFish <Actinopterygii>Agronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In Newfoundland and Labrador (hereafter, Newfoundland), all farmed Atlantic Salmon Salmo salar originate from the Saint John River, New Brunswick, strain, raising the question of potential impacts of escapees on wild, genetically distinct stocks. Unfertilized eggs of farmed and wild salmon were assessed for diameter, mass, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) content, and fertilization success, this is the first study to assess ATP content in Atlantic Salmon eggs. Results demonstrated that farmed salmon egg mass (0.1046 g), diameter (6.2 mm), and ATP content (0.0281 nmol/egg) were significantly lower than the same characteristics in wild salmon. Among and within females, variability in egg size was similar in both wild and farmed groups. This study lends some evidence to the fact that in the Newfoundland context, eggs of escaped farmed salmon may be less likely to produce viable, large larvae compared with their wild counterparts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorth American Journal of AquacultureSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207