MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000560890 · doi:10.1071/rdv23n1ab211

211 IN VIVO MATURATION AND IN VITRO FERTILIZATION OF ALPACA OOCYTES

2010· article· en· W2000560890 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. L. Condori, M. Chileno, J. Caínzos, Pedro J. García Herradón

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFollicular phaseOocyteIn vitro maturationAndrologyHuman fertilizationIn vitro fertilisationEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiologyChemistryMedicineAnatomyEmbryo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objectives of the study were to evaluate the ovarian follicular response, cumulus–oocyte complex (COC) collection rate, fertilization, and culture of COC collected from alpacas after treatment with 2 different gonadotropins. Female alpacas were assigned to Group 1 (n = 8), 200 mg of FSH (Folltropin, Bioniche, Belleville, Ontario, Canada) divided b.i.d. for 3 days, plus a single IM dose of 1000 IU of hCG (Chorulon, Intervet, Salamanca, Spain) 24 h after the last FSH treatment; or Group 2 (n = 10), 750 IU of eCG (Folligon, Intervet) as a single dose, plus a single IM dose of 1000 IU of hCG on Day 3 after eCG treatment (Day 0 = start of the superstimulatory treatment). At 20 to 22 h post-hCG treatment, the ovaries were surgically exposed and COC were aspirated from follicles =6 mm and evaluated. The COC with a homogeneous cytoplasm and 2 or more layers of cumulus cells were transferred to plates with a 40-µL drop of TCM-199 maturation medium supplemented with 10% FCS (vol/vol) plus 0.5 µg mL–1 of FSH, 10 µg mL–1 of hCG, 0.2 mM sodium pyruvate, 50 µg mL–1 of gentamicin, and 1 µg mL–1 of oestradiol under mineral oil with 10 to 12 oocytes/drop and maturated 24 h at 39°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and high humidity. After maturation, COC were removed and fertilized in vitro using epididymal sperm. Testes were collected from mature males from a slaughterhouse and transported to the laboratory. The caudal epididymide was isolated. A prick was made on the convoluted tubules with a sterile hypodermic needle and the fluid, rich in spermatozoa, was aspirated in syringes containing 2 mL of Tris-fructose egg yolk extender. Motile spermatozoa were obtained by centrifugation at 600 × g on a Percoll discontinuous gradient (45.0:22.5%) for 10 min. The supernatant was then removed by aspiration and the pellet was resuspended in TL-HEPES and centrifuged again at 300 × g for 5 min. The pellet was resuspended in TL-stock. Gametes were co-incubated for 18 h at 39°C with 5% CO2 and high humidity. Presumptive zygotes were cultured in KSOM medium supplemented with 1 mM glutamine, 0.3 mM sodium pyruvate, 50 µg mL–1 of gentamicin, EDTA, essential and nonessential amino acids, and BSA for 3 days and cultured in SOF medium for 7 days. Embryo development was evaluated at 72 h and 7 days. Data were subjected to ANOVA. The number of follicles =6 mm did not differ at the time of COC collection (19.3 ± 5.7 and 21.5 ± 7.3), and the number of COC collected was 16.7 ± 5.3 and 17.3 ± 6.6 for the FSH group and the eCG group, respectively. The cleavage rate was 45.2 and 42.1% for the FSH group and the eCG group, respectively, at 72 h of culture, and the blastocyst stage at Day 7 (22.2 v. 19.3) did not differ between treatments. In conclusion, the FSH and eCG treatments did not differ in the ovarian follicular response, COC collection rate, fertilization, and culture of COC. Both gonadotropins can be used in the IVF protocol for alpacas. Grant 064 FINCyT-PIBAP 2008 and Grant 032-2009 PROCYT–CONCYTEC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207