MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000579208 · doi:10.1080/10916460500283229

Pentane-Insoluble Matter from Conventional and Heavy Crudes: Relationships Between Thermal Characteristics and Molecular Parameters

2006· article· en· W2000579208 on OpenAlexaff
Yun Tu, Luba S. Kotlyar, B.D. Sparks, Keng H. Chung

Bibliographic record

VenuePetroleum Science and Technology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsAlberta EnergyNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphaltenePentaneCokeCrackingAsphaltOil sandsChemistryThermogravimetric analysisThermalFraction (chemistry)Chemical engineeringOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceThermodynamicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nearly 50% of bitumen derived from Athabasca oilsands is pitch. The pentane-insoluble fraction is the major coke producer during thermal cracking. Here, we evaluate the thermal behavior of pentane insolubles from various oil sources by correlating thermogravimetric data with structural parameters. The effect of any entrained mineral solids on the thermal properties results was also investigated. Coke yields depended significantly on aromaticity, H/C atomic ratios, molecular weight, chain length, and equivalent molecular diameter. With the exception of highly aliphatic Daqing conventional oil, coke yields correlated well with the calculated structural parameters. Asphaltene from bitumen was about average in its coke-forming propensity. Mineral solids had practically no effect on thermal behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePetroleum Science and TechnologySame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207