MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000588978 · doi:10.1185/030079907x226087

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among patients with Generalised Anxiety Disorder: evaluation conducted alongside an escitalopram relapse prevention trial

2007· article· en· W2000588978 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christer Allgulander, Torben Jørgensen, Alan Wade, C. François, Nicolas Despiégel, Pascal Auquier, M Toumi

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Medical Research and Opinion · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEscitalopramQuality of life (healthcare)Visual analogue scaleAnxietyPlaceboPopulationRandomizationPhysical therapyInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialPsychiatryAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) should be a treatment goal for patients with Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD). OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of treatment with escitalopram on HRQoL as well as the effect of relapse on HRQoL and work productivity. METHODS: This study was conducted alongside a double-blind, placebo-controlled, relapse prevention multinational clinical trial. Relapse was defined as a Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) >or= 15. Treatment responders (HAMA <or= 10) after 12 weeks of open-label treatment (10 mg/day escitalopram for Week 1 followed by 20 mg/day thereafter) were included. The study dataset comprised patients (n = 329) from French, Canadian, German and Swedish centres. HRQoL was assessed using the SF-36 scale, and data on sick leave and on-the-job productivity as measured by the Work Limitation Questionnaire and the work efficacy and work satisfaction visual analogue scales (VAS) scales were collected at baseline, randomization (Week 12), Weeks 36, 60 and at last assessment. For future health economic analysis, quality adjusted life years were calculated from the SF-36 results. RESULTS: At baseline, GAD patients reported significantly impaired quality of life compared with the general population. During the 12-week open-label treatment period, treatment responders reported significant improvements in HRQoL on all dimensions of the SF-36 (p < 0.001) and on-the-job productivity (p < 0.001), whereas sick leave decreased but did not reach statistical significance. After randomization, relapsed patients reported significantly lower QoL than non-relapsed patients on all 4 SF-36 mental health dimensions (p < 0.001). Relapsed patients reported slightly lower on-the-job productivity than non-relapsed patients and scored lower on the work efficacy and work satisfaction VAS scales. CONCLUSION: GAD adversely affects patient functioning and daily life. Short-term treatment with escitalopram reverses this impairment to population norms. GAD relapse is associated with a deterioration of HRQoL and work productivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.210
GPT teacher head0.513
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Medical Research and OpinionSame topicAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesFrench-language works237,207