MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000646355 · doi:10.1101/sqb.2003.68.159

Gene Expression Profiling of Cells, Tissues, and Developmental Stages of the Nematode C. elegans

2003· review· en· W2000646355 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institute on Aging
KeywordsCaenorhabditis elegansBiologyGeneModel organismNematodeGene expressionGene expression profilingOrganismRNA interferenceComputational biologyGeneticsCell biologyRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Completion of the DNA sequences of the humangenome and that of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegansallows the large-scale identification and analysis of orthologs of human genes in an organism amenable to detailed genetic and molecular analyses. We are determining gene expression profiles in specific cells, tissues, anddevelopmental stages in C. elegans. Our ultimate goal isnot only to describe detailed gene expression profiles, butalso to gain a greater understanding of the organization ofgene regulatory networks and to determine how they control cell function during development and differentiation...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it