MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000661508 · doi:10.1094/pdis-06-10-0433

First Report of <i>Fusarium solani</i> Causing Fruit Rot of Sweet Pepper in Trinidad

2010· article· en· W2000661508 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hema Ramdial, Sephra N. Rampersad

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMyceliumPotato dextrose agarConidiumHorticulturePepperCalyxChlamydosporeSpotsCultivarInoculationCropHyphaBotanyAgarAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Trinidad, sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is an important crop that is produced for local markets and regional export. From February to April 2010, severe fruit rot was observed in 9 of 11 commercial fields located in North Trinidad in the major production areas of North and South Aranguez. All fields were in the late harvesting stage and the most commonly grown cultivars were Aristotle and Canape. Disease incidence for each field was estimated to be 80% with a yield loss of 40 to 60%. Symptoms appeared on mature red fruits but growers reported that disease can also occur on green fruit. Symptoms began as soft lesions that turned dark brown to black. Lesions usually originated at the calyx end of the fruit and extended down the sides. Fruits were surface sterilized by rinsing with 70% ethanol for 2 min, followed by three rinses with sterile distilled water. Two 4-mm 3 blocks of tissue from the opposite sides of fruit lesions were transferred to water agar and incubated for 5 to 7 days at 25 ± 1°C. A 4-mm 3 agar block consisting of the leading mycelial edge was then transferred to potato dextrose agar (PDA) and incubated under the same conditions. Colonies on PDA were fast growing with white, fluffy, aerial mycelia; hyphae were septate and hyaline; conidiophores were unbranched; microconidia were abundant, thin walled, hyaline, ovoid, one to two celled, and measured 6 to 10 × 2 to 4 μm. Macroconidia were hyaline, three to four celled, curved, thick walled, and measured 20 to 30 × 4 to 6 μm. PCR amplification was carried out utilizing universal primers ITS4/5 and translation elongation factor primers EF1/2 (2). Sequence comparisons of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region (HM157262) and EF-1α gene (HQ014854) with cognate sequences available in GenBank and the FUSARIUM-ID databases revealed 100 and 99.6% sequence identity, respectively, to Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc. Pathogenicity tests were conducted by drop inoculating 10-μl of spore suspension (10 6 spores/ml) of each of four isolates on wounded and unwounded sites of mature sweet pepper fruits (five per isolate of cvs. Aristotle, Canape, Century, Destra, and Paladin). Control fruits were inoculated with sterile distilled water. Inoculated fruits were kept at 25 ± 1°C in loosely sealed plastic containers and monitored for the onset of symptoms for 6 days. The experiment was conducted twice. Lesions (8.0 to 15.2 mm in diameter) developed on wounded fruit of Aristotle, Canape, and Century. No symptoms were seen on Destra, Paladin, or the water controls. No symptoms developed on nonwounded fruits. Koch's postulates were fulfilled by reisolating the pathogen from infected tissues. Fruit rot caused by F. solani has been reported to be a serious constraint to sweet pepper production in Canada (4), the United Kingdom (1), and New Zealand (3). To our knowledge, this is the first report of Fusarium fruit rot of sweet pepper in Trinidad. References: (1) J. T. Fletcher. Plant Pathol. 43:225, 1994. (2) D. M. Geiser et al. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 110:473, 2004. (3) J. L. Tyson. Aust. Plant Pathol. 30:375, 2001. (4) R. Utkhede and S. Mathur. Plant Dis. 87:100, 2003.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207