Retour sur le concept d'aliénation: Un possible émancipateur masqué par le voile idéologique de la modernité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
English The evolution of the concept of alienation shows that the requirements of positivism and post-metaphysical thought in the social sciences have contributed to reducing the semantic heritage of this concept. Our reading of the writings of Habermas and Touraine demonstrates the relevance for the social sciences of reviving this heritage in order to shed light on a possible emancipator inherent to the formation of the subject. The writings of Habermas and Touraine certainly help to envisage the completion of the modernity project, by restoring the dimension specific to communicational rationality or the subject, against the invasion of instrumental reason. However, it appears necessary to highlight the specificity of the symbolic paradigm and the requirements related to individuation in order to recognize the historical relativity of the egological structure of conscience (ESC) and, thereby, the possibility of it being surpassed as suggested by the significant facts of new aspirations among individuals. French L'évolution du concept d'aliénation montre comment les exigences du positivisme et d'une pensée post-métaphysique en sciences sociales ont contribué à rétrécir l'héritage sémantique de ce concept. Notre lecture des travaux de Habermas et de Touraine fait apparaître la pertinence pour les sciences sociales de renouer avec cet héritage afin d'éclairer un possible émancipateur inhérent à la formation du sujet. Certes, ces travaux permettent d'envisager l'achèvement du projet de la modernité, en restituant la dimension propre de la rationalité communicationnelle ou du sujet, contre l'envahissement de la raison instrumentale. Cependant, il nous semble nécessaire de porter au jour la spécificité du paradigme symbolique et des exigences liées à l'individuation afin de reconnaÑtre la relativité historique de la structure egologique de la conscience (SEC) et, par le fait même, l'éventualité de son dépassement, que tendent d'ailleurs à suggérer certains faits significatifs de nouvelles aspirations chez les individus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.040 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".