Physiologic +G<SUB>z</SUB> Tolerance Responses Over Successive +G<SUB>z</SUB> Exposures in Simulated Air Combat Maneuvers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Fighter aircraft pilots are exposed to repetitive headward acceleration (+Gz) during air combat maneuvering. The objective of this study was to compare physiologic responses and the calculated +Gz tolerances of multiple successive +Gz exposures with the responses of the first +Gz exposure. METHODS: There were 13 subjects who performed simulated air combat maneuvering (SACM) profiles composed of 10 rapid-onset rate +Gz cycles with different combinations of short- or long-duration +Gz plateaus (8 or 20 s) and +Gz pauses (1 or 15 s). +Gz, plateaus were individually set at levels inducing strong physiologic responses while the +Gz pause was set at 1.4 Gz. Head-level systolic pressure, ear opacity, and vision quality were measured. RESULTS: The nadirs of head-level systolic pressure, ear opacity, and visual quality during each +Gz plateau were higher in subsequent cycles compared to the first +Gz cycle. There was an average increase in calculated +Gz tolerance of 0.35 +/- 0.21 Gz following the first +Gz cycle. SACMs with short +Gz pauses produced greater increases in +Gz tolerance than SACMs with long +Gz pauses. DISCUSSION: Cardiovascular and visual responses were improved over the course of successive +Gz cycles, indicating that the risk of +Gz-induced loss of consciousness was not increased beyond the first +Gz cycle. The increase in +Gz tolerance beginning with the second cycle is attributed to a carryover of compensatory responses, primarily vasoconstriction, with possible contribution from greater venous return and baroreflex enhancement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".