The association of split hand foot malformation (SHFM) and congenital heart defects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Split hand foot malformation (SHFM) (cleft hand, central ray deficiency) is a highly variable malformation that shows genetic heterogeneity with at least five loci mapped to date. SHFM occurs as an isolated finding or in association with other anomalies, including congenital heart defects (CHDs). METHODS: In total 48 SHFM1, 52 SHFM3, 48 SHFM4, 21 SHFM5, and four chromosome 8 patients were evaluated. In addition, we performed a literature review to identify "unmapped" SHFM patients with CHD to evaluate the various etiologies of this combination of findings. The London Dysmorphology Database also served as a resource to identify syndromes with this combination of phenotypic findings. Only patients presenting with both SHFM and CHD were included in the analysis. Classification of CHD among mapped and unmapped SHFM patients was performed utilizing the revised Clark classification. A closer inspection of the types of CHD found in this patient group was performed in order to investigate possible pathogenetic mechanisms. RESULTS: CHDs were found in 10% of SHFM1 patients, 47% of SHFM5 patients, but were not reported in SHFM2, SHFM4 patients, or patients mapped to chromosome 8. Forty-two syndromic cases and 15 cases of unrecognized syndromes were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The higher frequency of heart defects seen in SHFM1 and SHFM5 of the mapped patient group raises the question as to whether common mechanisms/genetic players are involved. Candidate genes for SHFM1 and SHFM5 include members of the DLX homeobox gene family.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".