MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000806221 · doi:10.1021/jp712180q

Carbonate Formation and Stability on a Pt/BaO/γ-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> NO<sub><i>X</i></sub> Storage/Reduction Catalyst

2008· article· en· W2000806221 on OpenAlexaff
William S. Epling, Charles H. F. Peden, János Szanyi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatalysisFormateCarbonateHydroxideChemistryInorganic chemistryFourier transform infrared spectroscopyBarium hydroxideHeterogeneous catalysisChemical engineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been recent debate regarding the role or influence of BaCO 3 species on the performance or operation of Pt/BaO/Al 2 O 3 model NO X storage/reduction (NSR) catalysts. This influence is primarily regarded as negative, but the extent of its impact is not clear. For this reason, the formation and stability of barium carbonate species on a Pt/BaO/Al 2 O 3 model NSR catalyst were characterized using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The catalyst sample was exposed to CO 2, CO, and CO + O 2 at various temperatures, from 300 to >500 K. Bidentate carbonate species readily form under all conditions, while at higher temperatures, unidentate species were also observed and likely formed from bidentate species as a result of a change in their coordination to the oxide surface. Reaction of CO X species with residual hydroxide species on the catalyst led to the formation of bicarbonates, and when the sample was exposed to CO at low temperature, formate species were also formed. These formate species decomposed at elevated temperatures and contributed to the formation of carbonates. H 2 O exposure resulted in the agglomeration of various CO X -containing phases to larger particles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207