MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000903529 · doi:10.1353/ces.2009.0001

Talking the “Immigrant Talk”: Immigration Narratives and Identity Construction among Colombian Newcomers

2009· article· en· W2000903529 on OpenAlex
Kinga Pozniak

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian ethnic studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Refugees, and Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationNarrativeMainstreamSociologyGender studiesEthnographyConstruct (python library)Identity (music)NegotiationHegemonyMedia studiesPolitical sciencePoliticsAnthropologySocial scienceAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper I explore the role of popular Canadian immigration narratives in shaping the experiences and subjectivities of immigrants to Canada, and the ways in which immigrants negotiate these narratives to construct their experiences and identities. My research is based on ethnographic fieldwork and interviews conducted with Colombian immigrants to Canada residing in London, Ontario. I identify two narratives that characterize Canadian discourse on immigration, and explore how Colombian newcomers both apply and challenge these two narratives in talking about everyday experiences and challenges. I show that i) hegemonic immigration narratives are a powerful lens through which Colombian newcomers construct their experiences and identities, and that ii) newcomers manipulate these narratives to negotiate between the representations of immigrants in mainstream discourse and their desired self-representations. Dans cet article, j’étudie d’une part en quoi les récits populaires canadiens de l’immigration ont mar-qué les immigrants au Canada sur le plan subjectif et dans leur expérience, et, d’autre part, la manière dont ils travaillent leurs histoires pour structurer celle-ci ainsi que leur identité. Ma recherche s’appuie sur un travail ethnographique de terrain et des entrevues d’immigrants colombi-ens résidant à London en Ontario. Elle me permet d’identifier deux sortes de discours pour carac-tériser l’immigration au Canada et d’étudier comment les nouveaux arrivants de Colombie ont recours à ces deux approches tout en les contestant, lorsqu’ils parlent de leur expérience quotidienne et de défis auxquels ils doivent faire face. Je montre donc 1) que les narrations dominantes d’immigration servent de loupe puissante à travers laquelle les nouveaux arrivants colombiens structurent leurs expériences et leur identité, et 2) que ceux-ci manipulent ces histoires pour louvoyer entre la représentation des immigrants dans le discours de monsieur Tout le monde et l’image d’eux-mêmes qu’ils voudraient mettre en avant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it