Electrostatic discharge protection for a 10 GHz low noise amplifier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two 10-GHz LNAs, one with ESD protection and another without ESD protection were designed and implemented in 0.13 μm RFCMOS technology. The ESD protection used encompasses PI topology ESD protection, comprising the primary ESD protection diodes, LNA gate inductor and secondary ESD protection diodes, and RC-triggered MOSFET power clamps. The desired level of ESD protection for the LNA was 2 KV for the Human Body Model (HBM). Measured results of the LNAs showed that both have similar performance, and the ESD test results showed that an ESD protection higher than 2 KV can be achieved. The LNA with ESD protection passed a 2 KV ESD stress without showing leakage and degradation of the S-parameters and noise figure, demonstrating that degradation of RF parameters can be minimized by choosing the appropriate ESD protection and by taking it into account early in the design process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".