Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy with a doughnut-shaped excitation profile as a characterization tool in STED microscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The resolution of stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopes is ultimately limited by the quality of the doughnut-shaped illumination profile of the STED erase beam. We show here that in the focal plane this illumination profile is well approximated by an analytical expression - a difference of Gaussian functions, which tends towards a first order Laguerre-Gaussian profile in the case of a well aligned beam with a true zero-intensity central minimum. We further show that along the optical axis the maximum intensity profile is reasonably approximated by a Gaussian decay away from the focal plane. The result is a fully Gaussian analytical approximation of the three-dimensional point-spread function of STED erase beams. This allows the derivation of an analytical form for the autocorrelation function of the fluorescence generated by fluorophore diffusion through the STED depletion volume. We verified this form to be correct by performing fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) experiments in solutions of the dye Alexa Fluor 532. Since the quality of the illumination profile is reflected in the shape of the autocorrelation function, we propose that fluctuation analysis can be used as a tool to assess the quality of STED erase beams.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".