Physicians' Cancer Chemotherapy Drug Manual 2001
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Medical Writings: Book Notes19 February 2002Physicians' Cancer Chemotherapy Drug Manual 2001Ellen F. Manzullo, MD and Roger W. Anderson, DrPHEllen F. Manzullo, MDThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.Search for more papers by this author and Roger W. Anderson, DrPHThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-136-4-200202190-00017 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Chu E, DeVita VT. 584 pages. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett; 2001. $56.95. ISBN 0763714488. Order phone 800-832-0034.Field of medicine: Oncology.Format: Spiral-bound softcover book and CD-ROM.Audience: Oncologists and trainees in oncology, internists, family practitioners, and various health care professionals involved in the care of patients with cancer.Purpose: To provide a practical reference on chemotherapeutic and biological agents in current clinical use for patients with cancer.Content: The manual is divided into four chapters. Chapter 1 reviews the principles of chemotherapy that have been used in cancer drug development. Chapter 2 provides detailed monographs on individual chemotherapeutic ... Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics 19 February 2002Volume 136, Issue 4Page: 340KeywordsCancer chemotherapyChemotherapeutic agentsClinical pharmacologyDrug interactionsDrugsPatientsPharmacokineticsSoftware toolsToxicityVomiting ePublished: 19 February 2002 Issue Published: 19 February 2002 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2002 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.491 | 0.365 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".