Physicians' Cancer Chemotherapy Drug Manual 2001
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Medical Writings: Book Notes19 February 2002Physicians' Cancer Chemotherapy Drug Manual 2001Ellen F. Manzullo, MD and Roger W. Anderson, DrPHEllen F. Manzullo, MDThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.Search for more papers by this author and Roger W. Anderson, DrPHThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-136-4-200202190-00017 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Chu E, DeVita VT. 584 pages. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett; 2001. $56.95. ISBN 0763714488. Order phone 800-832-0034.Field of medicine: Oncology.Format: Spiral-bound softcover book and CD-ROM.Audience: Oncologists and trainees in oncology, internists, family practitioners, and various health care professionals involved in the care of patients with cancer.Purpose: To provide a practical reference on chemotherapeutic and biological agents in current clinical use for patients with cancer.Content: The manual is divided into four chapters. Chapter 1 reviews the principles of chemotherapy that have been used in cancer drug development. Chapter 2 provides detailed monographs on individual chemotherapeutic ... Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics 19 February 2002Volume 136, Issue 4Page: 340KeywordsCancer chemotherapyChemotherapeutic agentsClinical pharmacologyDrug interactionsDrugsPatientsPharmacokineticsSoftware toolsToxicityVomiting ePublished: 19 February 2002 Issue Published: 19 February 2002 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2002 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it