Binding of polar monomers in the complexes with organometallic ethylene polymerization catalysts — Natural orbitals for chemical valence and energy decomposition analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The binding mode of polar monomers in complexes with late-transition-metal catalysts for ethylene polymerization was studied by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The Ziegler–Rauk energy decomposition scheme was used to characterize the geometry distortion and steric and orbital-interaction terms in the bonding energy, while Natural Orbitals for Chemical Valence (NOCV) were applied to describe the donation and back-bonding components of the bond between the monomer and the catalyst. The NOCV analysis allowed for comparison of the donor–acceptor properties of different monomers in the σ- and π-complexes. The complexes with the model, cationic Ni– or Pd–diimine catalysts, N^N–Ni(H)+ and N^N–Pd(H)+, and the neutral Ni–anilinotropone system, N^O–Ni(H), were investigated. The monomers studied included: simple olefins (Et and Pr); examples of oxygen- and nitrogen-containing polar monomers (methyl acrylate (MA), vinyl acetate (VAc), their fluorinated derivatives (FMA, FVAc), vinyl ether (VE), acrylonitrile (AN), and β-butenoic nitrile (BN); vinyl and allyl amines (VAm, PrAm); and a tertiary dimethyl vinyl amine (MVAm). The results demonstrate that the metal-based fragment has a significant influence on the relative stability of the σ- and π-complexes; the π-binding mode increases in the following order: N^N–Ni(H)+ < N^N–Pd(H)+ < N^O–Ni(H). The results of the Ziegler–Rauk bond-energy decomposition indicate that for some monomers (MA, FMA, VAc, AN, VAm, MVAm) the preference of the coordination mode has a steric (electrostatic and Pauli) origin. For other monomers (VE, FVAc, BN, PrAm) the changes in the orbital-interaction terms are important as well. The results of the NOCV analysis indicate that for both, σ- and π-coordination modes there exist components describing σ-donation and π-back-bonding. The sequences of σ-donor and π-acceptor properties of monomers in the π-complexes as well as σ-complexes are similar for the considered catalysts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".