MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Interaction of Methylene Blue Dye with Calcium–Silicate–Hydrate

2008· article· en· W2001067099 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Ceramic Society · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicBuilding materials and conservation
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethylene blueCalcium silicate hydrateHydrateDistilled waterSilicateCalcium silicateChemistryPolymerizationNuclear chemistryMethyleneMaterials scienceNanostructureChemical engineeringCrystallographyMineralogyOrganic chemistryChromatographyNanotechnologyPolymerMetallurgyCementComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interaction of methylene blue (MB) dye solution with various calcium–silicate–hydrate (C–S–H) preparations (C/S ratio=0.60–1.80) was investigated. Experiments were also performed by treating the C–S–H in lime‐saturated water and distilled water. The effects of MB on the X‐ray basal spacing and the degree of polymerization were determined using low‐angle X‐ray diffraction (XRD) and 29 Si MAS NMR spectroscopy. An interaction mechanism for C–S–H–MB using a “bridging” model for the C–S–H nanostructure is proposed. The model is consistent with the XRD and 29 Si MAS NMR results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it