Spectroscopic Study of Intermolecular Interactions in Various Oligofluorenes: Precursors of Light-Emitting Polymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A detailed analysis of the optical and photophysical properties of 2,7-bis(phenylene)-9,9-dioctylfluorene (PFP), 2,7-bis(biphenylene)-9,9-dioctylfluorene (BPFBP), 2,7-bis(2-thienyl)-9,9-dioctylfluorene (TFT), and 2,7-bis(2,2 \ -bithien-5-yl)-9,9-dioctylfluorene (BTFBT) in various environments are reported. The optical properties of the free molecules isolated in an alkane matrix are obtained and discussed in terms of the conformation adopted by each derivative in the electronic ground and first excited states. Also, conformational changes are responsible for the optical changes observed at high concentrations in an isopentane glass at 77 K. High quantum yields of all the oligofluorenes at 77 K indicate the absence of quenching effects such as excitonic or aggregation effects. The similar spectral and photophysical properties in matrix and glass environments are explained by the disorder introduced in oligofluorenes by long octyl chains at the C-9 position of the fluorene moiety. To study the effect of intermolecular interactions in the solid state, we recorded the spectra of thin films of these derivatives. The much red-shifted emission band in the solid state cannot be explained by conformational changes and has its origin in the π-stacking of conjugated oligomers in their relaxed S 1 state. As an evidence to show the importance of the role played by octyl chains at the C-9 position of the fluorene moiety, we synthesized two new model compounds: one, without octyl chains at the C-9 position of the fluorene moiety, 2,7-bis(2-thienyl)fluorene (TFTWC) and another with more octyl chains, 1,4-bis(9,9-dioctylfluoren-2-yl)phenyl (FPF). The spectral properties of these derivatives have been studied at room temperature and at 77 K. These systems serve as excellent examples to show the effect of intermolecular interactions on optical properties of oligofluorenes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".