MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001318213 · doi:10.2118/0908-0022-jpt

Comments: Unconventional Interest

2008· article· en· W2001318213 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Donnelly

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil shaleGeologyShale gasTight oilDrillingUnconventional oilPetroleum industryMining engineeringPaleontologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Editor's column High commodity prices and the need for new production are spurring great interest in unconventional oil and gas plays throughout North America. Majors, previously willing to cede mature areas to independents so they could focus on bigger prizes elsewhere, have taken renewed interest in their potential. Following the success of the Barnett Shale region in the US, attention has turned to the Haynesville Shale gas play in northwest Louisiana and east Texas, British Columbia, and the Bakken area in North Dakota. The Barnett Shale has been one of the great success stories in gas production in the past few years, thanks to advances in drilling and fracturing technology. That success, and the play's future potential, are discussed in-depth in an article in this issue that begins on page 48. Now other areas are attracting attention. An array of upstream acquisitions involving unconventional production have taken place in the past several months in North America involving both Canadian and US firms, and including independents and majors. In late July, BP became a participant in US shale gas with an acquisition of 90,000 net acres and 50 million ft3/D of gas production in the Oklahoma Woodford Shale gas area. That follows Shell's recent deal with EnCana for a joint exploration agreement to explore and develop the Haynesville Shale area. Chesapeake and its joint venture partner Plains Exploration & Production believe Haynesville Shale will eventually become the largest gas field in the US and the fourth-largest in the world. Shell also made the year's biggest acquisition to date when it paid USD 5.9 billion for Canada's Duvernay Oil, which has extensive acreage in western Canada's tight gas area. Of particular interest is the Montney Basin in northeast British Columbia, which has emerged as one of North America's most interesting gas plays. Traditionally, majors have sold off mature areas to independents as they looked for bigger and higher-potential fields outside of North America. But with resource nationalism limiting access and high oil prices making unconventional projects more economic, international oil companies (IOCs) are taking a new look at some areas in the US and Canada, particularly in light of the technological progress that has been made in fields such as the Barnett Shale. Independents such as Devon, Chesapeake, XTO, and EOG Resources have been the dominant players in developing North America's unconventional reservoirs, but that apparently is changing. Other newly active firms in these emerging plays include EnCana, which has begun investing heavily in the Haynesville Shale and the Horn River basin Shale in British Columbia and Hess, which is investing in Bakken. Most of the world's oil shale is in the US, with the US Geologic Service estimating about 2 trillion bbl of in-place deposits, but shale is very costly to develop and produce. But as IOCs continue to look for new sources of oil and access constraints hamper where they can go to find it, these challenging frontier areas—including shale, tight gas, heavy oil, and coalbed methane—should attract increasing attention going forward.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchFrench-language works237,207