MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001340985 · doi:10.1680/geng.2005.158.2.83

Numerical modelling of groundwater pumping processes

2005· article· en· W2001340985 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Maria Mavroulidou, Michael Gunn, R. I. Woods

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsPhreaticDewateringGroundwaterFinite element methodGroundwater modelBoundary value problemNumerical analysisField (mathematics)Environmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringGroundwater flowComputer scienceGeologyAquiferEngineeringMathematicsStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Engineers need versatile tools in order to design successful dewatering schemes to counteract the effects of changing groundwater levels in cities. In the present paper, a finite-element program is used to perform pumping analyses, involving moving phreatic surfaces and possible desaturation of materials. First, a problem of local dewatering from a line of wells is analysed, involving desaturation of the soil. The results from an analytical solution as well as those of the numerical model are compared with field data. It is shown that the numerical results, accounting for soil desaturation, are closer to field measurements. Second, the ability of the finite-element program to model falling and subsequently rising groundwater levels in cities due to variable water abstraction (as in the case of London) is assessed. The techniques show promise and are sufficiently flexible to be applied to other geologies and boundary conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical EngineeringSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207