MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001351900 · doi:10.1196/annals.1345.031

Single and Combination Drug Therapy for Fetal Hemoglobin Augmentation in Hemoglobin E‐β<sup>0</sup>‐Thalassemia: Considerations for Treatment

2005· article· en· W2001351900 on OpenAlexaff
Sylvia T. Singer, Frans A. Kuypers, Nancy F. Olivieri, D. J. Weatherall, Robert Mignacca, Thomas D. Coates, Sally C. Davies, Nancy Sweeters, Elliott Vichinsky

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsFetal hemoglobinThalassemiaHemoglobinHemoglobinopathyMedicineDrugHemoglobin ABeta thalassemiaHemoglobin A2FetusInternal medicinePharmacologyHemolytic anemiaPregnancyBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with hemoglobin E (Hb E)-beta 0-thalassemia, one of the most common hemoglobinopathies worldwide, could benefit from drugs that increase fetal and total hemoglobin levels and thereby decrease the need for transfusions. The long-term clinical outcome of such therapy, its hematologic effects, and which patients are likely to benefit from treatment are unknown. Consequently, the use of such drugs for Hb E-beta 0-thalassemia is limited, and countries where resources for safe and regular transfusion are scarce cannot benefit from them. In a multicenter trial of 42 patients treated with hydroxyurea for two years, almost half the patients demonstrated a significant increase in steady-state hemoglobin level. Drug toxicity was minimal. Combined treatment of hydroxyurea with erythropoietin benefited selected patients, but the addition of sodium phenyl butyrate was ineffective. After 5 years of follow-up, a subset of patients remained off transfusions. Hydroxyurea should be considered for a subset of Hb E-beta 0-thalassemia patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesSame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207