Equilibrium conversion and reaction analysis in sulfur‐iodine thermochemical hydrogen production cycle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Equilibrium conditions of the main reactions of the SI cycle were studied in this paper. The extent of reaction for two main reactions of this cycle including sulfuric acid decomposition and hydrogen iodide decomposition was evaluated as a function of temperature, pressure, and initial mole number of reactants. In the reaction modelling of sulfuric acid and sulfur trioxide decompositions, two models including simple and multiple reaction models were considered. In the simple model, it was assumed that two decomposition reactions proceeded independently. However, in the multiple reaction model, both reactions were considered simultamneously. It was shown that the Bunsen reaction completely proceeded in the range of operating conditions of the Bunsen reactor. Also, sulfuric acid was demonstrated to be decomposed at a higher rate when the reaction temperature and initial concentration of the sulfuric acid and sulfur trioxide increased. Furthermore, the operating pressure had to be maintained at lower values and the generated sulfur dioxide had to be withdrawn from the reactor in order to have a higher yield of product in this reactor. Finally, in the hydrogen iodide decomposition, the operating pressure, temperature, and concentration of hydrogen iodide had to be maintained at higher values to have a complete reaction. Moreover, the generated hydrogen was shown to be withdrawn from the hydrogen iodide reactor to prevent from backward reaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".