Effect of <i>P</i> <sub>O2</sub> on Bulk and Grain Boundary Resistance of n‐Type BaTiO <sub>3</sub> at Cryogenic Temperatures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Complex impedance analysis at cryogenic temperatures has revealed that the bulk and grain boundary properties of BaTiO 3 polycrystals are very sensitive to the oxygen partial pressure during sintering. Polycrystals sintered at P O2 as low as 10 −15 atm were already electrically heterogeneous. The activation energy of the bulk conductivity in the rhombohedral phase was found to be close to that of the reduced undoped single crystal (i.e., 0.093 eV). The activation energy of the grain boundary conductivity increases with the temperature of the postsinter oxidation treatment from 0.064 to 0.113 eV. Analysis of polycrystalline BaTiO 3 sintered in reducing atmosphere and then annealed at P O2 = 0.2 atm has shown that the onset of the PTCR effect occurs at much higher temperatures than expected in the framework of the oxygen chemisorption model. The EPR intensity of barium and titanium vacancies increases after oxidation at T > 1000°C. A substantial PTCR effect is achieved only after prolonged annealing of the ceramic in air at temperatures as high as 1200–1250°C. This result suggests that the PTCR effect in polycrystalline BaTiO 3 is associated with interfacial segregation of cation vacancies during oxidation of the grain boundaries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".