Development of strips of ovine testes after xenografting under the skin of mice and co-transplantation of exogenous spermatogonia with grafts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Xenografting of testicular tissue is an attractive new strategy for studying postnatal development of spermatogenesis and to preserve male genetics in large mammals. Typically, small cubes of immature testis (1 mm(3)) are grafted under the dorsal skin of immune-deficient mice. We attempted to increase the total number of seminiferous tubules in each xenograft with spermatogenesis by grafting flat strips of testis (approximately 9 x 5 x 1 mm) from ram lambs in immune-deficient mice. The percentage of grafts that survived and percentage of seminiferous tubules that developed spermatogenesis were the same as those reported after xenografting small cubes of lamb testis. Partially purified sheep spermatogonia were labeled with the fluorescent dye carboxy fluorescein diacetate succinyl diester and transplanted into the seminiferous tubules of one of the donor testis just before engraftment. The temporary label in the donor cells was detected for 4 weeks after xenografting, suggesting that co-engraftment of spermatogonia with testicular tissue may be a way to rapidly determine the effect of a specific gene on spermatogenesis. Finally, Sertoli cell lesions in xenografts of lamb testes were quantified, and their number and severity were found to increase, especially after grafts had been in place for 4 weeks. Although this coincided with the development of spermatogenesis, the extent of germ cell differentiation negatively correlated with severity of the lesions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".