The Conformational Origin of the Barrier to the Formation of Neighboring Group Assistance in Glycosylation Reactions: A Dynamical Density Functional Theory Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Static and dynamical Density Functional Theory studies of 2,6-di-O-acetyl-3,4-O-isopropylidene-D-galactopyranosyl cation have shown that this cation can exist in two conformers characterized as (2)S(O) and B(2,5), respectively. The (2)S(O) conformer has the O-2 acyl group equatorial with the carbonyl syn to H-2 and is populated by monocyclic oxocarbenium ions. These conformational features are present in the structurally related glycosyl donor ethyl 2,6-di-O-benzoyl-3,4-O-isopropylidene-beta-D-galactothiopyranoside as determined by X-ray diffraction studies. The B(2,5) conformer has O-2 axial and allows the carbonyl to rotate and close the five-membered ring to form a bicyclic dioxolenium ion. Constraints based on natural internal coordinates were implemented to study this conformational transition. In this way the barrier to interconversion has been determined to be 34 kJ mol(-)(1) with a transition state characterized as (O)S(2) and a pathway involving pseudorotation. Thus, for the first time the structures and energetics of the key ions postulated to be involved in neighboring group assisted glycosylation reactions have been determined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".