MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001574266 · doi:10.1021/ja001194l

The Conformational Origin of the Barrier to the Formation of Neighboring Group Assistance in Glycosylation Reactions:  A Dynamical Density Functional Theory Study

2001· article· en· W2001574266 on OpenAlexaff
Attila Bérces, G.D. Enright, Tomoo Nukada, Dennis M. Whitfield

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCarbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaSteacie Institute for Molecular SciencesInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryConformational isomerismPseudorotationDensity functional theoryStereochemistryCrystallographyOxocarbeniumRing (chemistry)Functional groupGroup (periodic table)Transition stateComputational chemistryMoleculeCatalysisNucleophile

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Static and dynamical Density Functional Theory studies of 2,6-di-O-acetyl-3,4-O-isopropylidene-D-galactopyranosyl cation have shown that this cation can exist in two conformers characterized as (2)S(O) and B(2,5), respectively. The (2)S(O) conformer has the O-2 acyl group equatorial with the carbonyl syn to H-2 and is populated by monocyclic oxocarbenium ions. These conformational features are present in the structurally related glycosyl donor ethyl 2,6-di-O-benzoyl-3,4-O-isopropylidene-beta-D-galactothiopyranoside as determined by X-ray diffraction studies. The B(2,5) conformer has O-2 axial and allows the carbonyl to rotate and close the five-membered ring to form a bicyclic dioxolenium ion. Constraints based on natural internal coordinates were implemented to study this conformational transition. In this way the barrier to interconversion has been determined to be 34 kJ mol(-)(1) with a transition state characterized as (O)S(2) and a pathway involving pseudorotation. Thus, for the first time the structures and energetics of the key ions postulated to be involved in neighboring group assisted glycosylation reactions have been determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicCarbohydrate Chemistry and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207