The Origins and Outcomes of Triplet and Quadruplet Pregnancies in Nova Scotia: 1980 to 2001
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the rate, origin, maternal and perinatal outcomes, and the associated hospital costs of higher order multiple births in one Canadian province. All higher order multiple pregnancies (triplets and above) in Nova Scotia over a 22-year period (1980 to 2001) were reviewed, and the maternal and perinatal outcomes and hospital costs were compared with singletons and twins in the same hospital population. During the 22-year period, 116,785 infants were delivered, including 3448 twins, 99 triplets, and 16 quadruplets. Of the higher order multiple gestations, 51.4% were conceived through infertility therapy. When compared with mothers of either singletons or twins, mothers of higher order gestations were significantly older, had longer antepartum and postpartum hospital stays, were more likely to have cesarean delivery, preterm labor, preeclampsia, and require intensive care unit admission. Triplets and quadruplets had significantly higher rates of preterm delivery, major anomalies, neonatal intensive care, respiratory distress syndrome, intrauterine growth restriction, serious morbidity, 5-minute Apgar scores < or = 3, and neonatal death than twins or singletons. The estimated hospital costs for this population ranged from 6,750 US dollars for a singleton pregnancy to 278,400 US dollars for a quadruplet pregnancy. Maternal morbidity, perinatal morbidity and mortality, and hospital costs are significantly increased in higher order births compared with both twins and singletons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".