Density of states and quantum phase transition in the thermodynamic limit of the Mermin central-spin model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We apply a spin-coherent states formalism to study the simplest version of a central-spin model, the so-called Mermin model, in which a given (central) spin 1/2 interacts symmetrically with a "bath" composed of N spins 1/2, characterized by a common frequency. The symmetric interaction allows one to restrict the problem to the fully symmetric sector of the Hilbert space associated with these N spins and therefore to treat these as one large N/2 spin. In particular, we derive analytic expressions for the integrated density of states in the thermodynamic limit when the number of bath spins is taken to infinity. From the thermodynamic limit spectrum we show the phase diagram for the system can be divided into four regions, partitioned, on the one hand, into a symmetric (nondegenerate) phase or a broken symmetry (degenerate) phase, and, on the other hand, by the case of overlapping or nonoverlapping energy surfaces. The nature and position of singularities appearing in the energy surfaces change as one moves from region to region. Our spin-coherent states formalism naturally leads us to the Majorana representation, which is useful to transform the Schrödinger equation into a Ricatti-like form that can be solved in the thermodynamic limit to obtain closed-form expressions for the integrated density of states. The energy surface singularities correspond with critical points in the density of states. We then use our results to compute expectation values for the system that help to characterize the nature of the quantum phase transition between the symmetric and broken phases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".