MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001834203 · doi:10.1016/j.crci.2004.10.036

The influence of the counterion B(C6F5)3CH3– and solvent effects on the propagation and termination steps of ethylene polymerization catalyzed by Cp2ZrR+ (R = Me,Pr). A density functional study

2005· article· en· W2001834203 on OpenAlex
Tom Ziegler, Kumar Vanka, Zhitao Xu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueComptes Rendus Chimie · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsChemistryCounterionEthylenePolymerizationCatalysisExothermic reactionPolymer chemistryChain propagationLewis acids and basesChain terminationDensity functional theoryMonomerTransition stateComputational chemistryIonOrganic chemistryRadical polymerizationPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cp 2 Zr(CH 3 )R and its derivatives can serve as powerful olefin polymerization catalysts after activation by a Lewis acid A to form the ion-pair [Cp 2 ZrR] + [CH 3 A] – ( I ) which is held together by a Zr-μ-CH 3 A – bridge. It is generally assumed that the cation Cp 2 ZrR + ( II ) of I is the active species whereas the influence of the anion CH 3 A – ( III ) is less well understood. We have conducted an extensive study based on density functional theory (DFT) of ethylene polymerization catalyzed by both I and II in order to probe the influence of the anion CH 3 A – for the case where A = B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 . The reaction between ethylene and the cation II leads in the first place to a π−complex in a highly exothermic and exogonic reaction without any (uptake) barrier. Even the subsequent insertion process has a transition state that is lower in energy than II and C 2 H 4 at full separation. The only (internal) barrier is the modest energy required to proceed from the π-complex to the insertion transition state. For the reaction between the ion-pair and ethylene the monomer can approach cis or trans to the Zr-μ-CH 3 A – bridge. In addition with R = Pr, cis and trans approaches are possible for 4 different orientations of the propyl chain. We find for all of these approaches that the rate determining step is the (partial) displacement of the anion CH 3 A – . For the first insertion (R = Me) the total insertion barrier is 13.0 kcal/mol for the most favorable (trans) approach. The second (R = Pr) insertion (which likely also is a good model for subsequent propagation steps) prefer a cis-approach in which the ethylene uptake barrier of 9.5 kcal/mol is rate determining whereas the barrier for the subsequent insertion process only is 6.8 kcal/mol. Displacement of the anion was found to be more pronounced for R = Pr than R = Me and larger for the insertion transition state than the uptake transition state. Solvation effects were seen to stabilize anion displacement and thus reduce especially insertion barriers. Thus for the favored cis-path of the second propagation, the insertion was the rate determining step in the gas-phase with a barrier of 10.0 kcal/mol whereas the corresponding uptake process became the rate determining step in solution with a barrier of 8.6 kcal/mol. After the insertion, the ion-pair was found to recombine completely so that ethylene will have to displace the anion in the next propagation step. Considerations were also given to the chain termination step by transfer of hydrogen to the monomer. Here the rate determining step is again cis-uptake off ethylene with a barrier of 12.5 kcal/mol whereas the subsequent hydrogen transfer barrier only is 10.6 kcal/mol. .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.297
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it