4 thematic patterns described the experience of placing a relative with Alzheimer’s disease in a special care unit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Butcher HK, Holkup PA, Park M, et al. Thematic analysis of the experience of making a decision to place a family member with Alzheimer’s disease in a special care unit. Res Nurs Health2001 Dec; 24 : 470 –80 [OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] QUESTION: How do caregivers describe their experiences of deciding to place a relative with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in a special care unit (SCU)? Semistructured interviews. 3 midwestern states in the US. 30 family caregivers (80% women; 70% children and 30% spouses of patients) of relatives with AD who lived in an SCU. Caregivers were interviewed for 1–3 hours by clinical nurse specialists or a gerontology specialist. These semistructured interviews were videotaped and transcribed. Caregivers were asked to describe the type and quantity of care they had provided before the SCU placement; their involvement since placement; the quality of their relationship with the SCU staff; their evaluation of the care their relative was receiving; and their views about the SCU placement. They were also asked to describe their feelings at the time of making the decision and during the actual relocation of their relative, and what helped or hindered … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DResearch%2Bin%2Bnursing%2B%2526%2Bhealth%26rft.stitle%253DRes%2BNurs%2BHealth%26rft.aulast%253DButcher%26rft.auinit1%253DH.%2BK.%26rft.volume%253D24%26rft.issue%253D6%26rft.spage%253D470%26rft.epage%253D480%26rft.atitle%253DThematic%2Banalysis%2Bof%2Bthe%2Bexperience%2Bof%2Bmaking%2Ba%2Bdecision%2Bto%2Bplace%2Ba%2Bfamily%2Bmember%2Bwith%2BAlzheimer%2527s%2Bdisease%2Bin%2Ba%2Bspecial%2Bcare%2Bunit.%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1002%252Fnur.10005%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F11746076%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/nur.10005&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=11746076&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febnurs%2F5%2F4%2F128.1.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000172557000004&link_type=ISI
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".