Does initial suppression of allofeeding in small jays help to conceal their nests?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A neglected question in the study of communal breeding in birds concerns why alloparenting begins at variously late stages in the nesting cycle. We studied this phenomenon in the Gray Jay (Perisoreus canadensis), a species in which nonbreeders are excluded from the nest area by parental hostility and begin to feed young only during the fledgling period. We hypothesize that this pattern is favoured because of the risk of nest predation. By initially suppressing allofeeding, Gray Jay parents may reduce the frequency of predator-attracting visits to the nest when the young are most vulnerable. We evaluated this predator-avoidance hypothesis in a six-part meta-analysis using observations of 111 philopatric and immigrant nonbreeders associated with 647 pairs over 33 years and nest-visitation data for 307 other passerines. First, we found indirect evidence that Gray Jays and other corvids with non-allofeeding nonbreeders do reduce nest visitation by excluding nonbreeders. Second, we found that the hostility of adult Gray Jays towards nonbreeders peaks during the incubation and nestling periods, is stronger closer to the nest, and is directed towards both related and unrelated nonbreeders. We then found support for four predictions stemming from the predator-avoidance hypothesis. Compared with species having allofeeding nonbreeders, the Gray Jay and other corvids with non-allofeeding nonbreeders are characterized by (i) smaller clutches; (ii) lower parental nest-visitation rates (a consequence of larger food loads); (iii) a greater increase in parental feeding visits after fledging, paralleling the simultaneous relaxation of parental hostility towards potential allofeeders; and (iv) a smaller body size and smaller social groups, rendering them less able to deter nest predators. We discuss the potential value of the predator-avoidance perspective for understanding the occurrence or absence of allofeeding in other birds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".