MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001961299 · doi:10.1159/000139346

Inhibition of the Natriuretic Action of the Imidazoline Receptor Agonist Moxonidine by Indometacin in the Rat

2008· article· en· W2001961299 on OpenAlexaff
Francis K. Darkwa, Donald D. Smyth

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoxonidineAgonistImidazoline receptorIndometacinEndocrinologyChemistryInternal medicinePharmacologyMedicineReceptorEnzyme inhibitorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indometacin pretreatment potentiates the natriuretic action of the mixed alpha 2-adrenoceptor/imidazoline receptor agonist clonidine. In the present study we determined the effects of indometacin pretreatment on natriuretic actions of the selective I1 imidazoline receptor agonist. In anaesthetized rats, an intrarenal infusion of moxonidine (0, 0.3, 1, and 3 nmol/kg/min) increased urine flow rate and sodium excretion without altering blood pressure or creatinine clearance. Indometacin pretreatment abolished the subsequent natriuretic response to an intrarenal infusion of moxonidine (1 nmol/kg/min) without altering blood pressure or creatinine clearance. Administration of prostaglandin E2, at an infusion rate (1 microgram/kg/min) which alone failed to alter urine flow rate, sodium excretion, blood pressure, or creatinine clearance, partially, but not completely, restored the natriuretic response to moxonidine. The ability of indometacin pretreatment to potentiate natriuretic actions of an alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist and to attenuate those of an imidazoline agonist indicates that these two receptors in the kidney are unique and may serve distinct functions in the regulation of sodium and water excretion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacologySame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207