Renal Resistive Index and Urinary N-acetyl-Beta-glucosaminidase as Predictors of Early Renal Involvement in Patients WithEssential Hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The long-standing essential hypertension causes renal injury. N-acetyl-beta -glucosaminidase (NAG) was considered as an indicator of the functional status of the renal tubules. The resistive index (RI), measured at the level of the interlobar arteries, is thought to reflect downstream vascular impedence and therefore, has been suggested as a measure of renal arterial stiffness. The aim of this study was to investigate whether changes in renal function assessed by urinary N-acet yl-beta-gl ucosaminidase (NAG) and proteinurea are present in hypertensive patients with normal serum creatinine and the association of these changes with renal vascular resistance assessed by ultrasound Doppler. Methods: The study enrolled 78 patients with essential hypertension and 57 age- and sex-matched normotensive subjects. BMI, creatinine, creatinine clearance, uric acid, lipid profile, total proteins, NAG and creatinine in urine were assessed. RI was evaluated by ultrasound Doppler of the interlobar arteries. Results : Hypertensive patients had significantly higher urinary excreted NAG, total urinary proteins and RI than controls. RI was significantly correlated with age, systolic blood pressure, hypertension duration, total proteins, total cholesterol, excreted NAG and creatinine clearance. In multivariate analysis RI was significantly and independently influenced by NAG and creatinine clearance. Conclusion: Early glomerular and tubular dysfunctions precede the overt changes in serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate in hypertensive patients. Resistive index is increased along with these abnormalities. So, it should be regarded as a marker of early renal and systemic vascular damage and could help identify hypertensive patients for whom more aggressive preventive and therapeutic measures are advisable. doi:10.4021/wjnu2w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".