MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract SY37-04: Bcl-2 family proteins as a paradigm for protein:protein interactions as chemotherapy targets

2014· article· en· W2002002282 on OpenAlexaff
David W. Andrews

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCell biologyBiologyBcl-2 familyProtein familyCytoplasmMembrane proteinProtein–protein interactionProgrammed cell deathIntegral membrane proteinSignal transductionApoptosisBiochemistryMembraneGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Many aspects of cell signaling are regulated by protein:protein interactions including growth factor receptor signal transduction pathways, transcriptional regulatory complexes and programmed cell death. The Bcl-2 family proteins regulate programmed cell death via a series of protein:protein interactions that occur in the cytoplasm and in membranes. These interactions are regulated by the amount of the proteins, their locations and by post-translational modifications. The multi-domain pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members Bax and Bak directly regulate mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP), an event widely accepted as committing most cells to apoptosis. MOMP results from an ordered series of steps beginning with activation of one or more Bcl-2 homology 3 proteins (BH3-proteins). Once activated, BH3-proteins bind to mitochondria, directly recruit and activate Bax and the constitutively membrane bound Bak. In some cases ‘activation’ involves releasing a previously activated Bax or Bak from inhibition by an anti-apoptotic protein of the Bcl-2 family. Oligomerization of integral membrane Bax and/or Bak culminates in membrane permeabilization. The embedded together model describes these interactions as a series of dynamic equilibria that change when the proteins interact with membranes. Because of their role regulating apoptosis in cancer cells and in response to chemotherapy, Bcl-2 family proteins are attractive targets for the development of small molecule inhibitors. The rational development of small molecules requires understanding in detail the molecular interactions that regulate activity. However, studying protein:protein interactions for membrane bound proteins is fraught with difficulties. I will describe some of the challenges of studying this family of proteins and the successes and surprises that resulted from our analyzing and perturbing their interactions for a variety of Bcl-2 family proteins in live cells. I will highlight recent data that suggests new avenues to targeting Bcl-2 family protein:protein interactions therapeutically. Citation Format: David W. Andrews. Bcl-2 family proteins as a paradigm for protein:protein interactions as chemotherapy targets. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr SY37-04. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-SY37-04

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicMitochondrial Function and Pathology→French-language works237,207→