Characterization of fouled membranes from a membrane enhanced biological phosphorus removal system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Characterization of fouled membranes is the first step towards a good understanding of membrane fouling nature and thus formulating effective engineering measures for fouling prevention and control. In this study, fouled membrane fibres collected from a pilot scale membrane enhanced biological phosphorus removal (MEBPR) process were systematically examined. Several analytical tools, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), conventional optical microscopy (COM), energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) microanalysis, matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization--mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) analysis, and conventional chemical analysis techniques were used. The results indicated that membrane fouling in the MEBPR process was mainly of an organic nature, and most extractable foulants were carbohydrates and humic or humic-like substances. Unlike in other wastewater treatment membrane bioreactors, microbial growth on fouled membranes was not substantial, probably due to the vigorous aeration applied and the strong hydrodynamic conditions within the membrane pore structure. After a period of sludge filtration, membrane surfaces became more hydrophobic and the resultant hydrophobic interactions between the fouled membranes and mixed liquor constituents might have accelerated the fouling process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".