Gap dynamics and replacement patterns in gaps of the northeastern boreal forest of Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The northeastern boreal forest of Quebec is characterized by a humid climate. Consequently, fires are less frequent and small-scale disturbances play an important role in forest dynamics. Natural mortality and nonfire disturbances such as insect outbreaks and windthrow lead to gap-driven processes. Changes in structure and species composition can result from gap dynamics. The objectives of this study were to characterize gaps and examine patterns of species replacement in gaps in old conifer stands. Line intersect sampling was used to sample stands dominated by balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.) and (or) black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) BSP). Results show that 54% of the forest was in expanded gaps and that canopy gaps are relatively small, since 87% of them were smaller than 100 m 2 . The majority (94%) of the openings were caused by the mortality of less than 10 gap makers. Replacement probabilities show self-replacement of A. balsamea in Abies stands and of P. mariana in Picea stands. However, in Abies-Picea stands, there seems to be a reciprocal replacement of the two species. These results provide knowledge of the disturbance dynamics of the region as a basis for development of silvicultural practices that preserve the structural components of older forest stands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".