MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002102945 · doi:10.1071/rdv20n1ab19

19 THE EFFECT OF PROGESTERONE ON FOLLICULAR DEVELOPMENT AND PREGNANCY RATE IN BEEF CATTLE

2007· article· en· W2002102945 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Luis Francisco Machado Pfeifer, R.J. Mapletoft, Gregor B. Adams, J. Kastelic, J. A. Small, F. C. F. Dias, Jaswant Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvulationEstrous cycleEstradiol benzoatePregnancyFollicular phaseFollicleAnimal sciencePregnancy rateMedicineFertilityInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiologyHormonePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective was to determine the effect of the level of progesterone (P4) during the ovulatory wave on fertility. Low v . high progesterone concentrations which were expected to result in high v . low LH pulse-frequency were compared. Lactating, postpartum beef cows ( n = 69) at random stages of the estrous cycle were given cloprostenol (PGF; Schering-Plough Animal Health, Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada) twice at an 11-day interval to synchronize ovulation (Day 0 = day of 2nd PGF). Cows were given 1.5 mg estradiol benzoate on Day 10 (7 days after expected ovulation). On Day 10, the Low-P4 group was given PGF and an intravaginal CueMate (Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, ON, Canada) containing one P4 pod (expected to achieve a P4 plasma level of 1 ng mL–1). The High-P4 group also received a CueMate with one pod on Day 10, but no PGF was administered (i.e., cows were allowed to retain their CL for 4 days after expected emergence of the estradiol-induced wave). On Day 18, CueMates were removed and PGF was administered to both groups. Fifty-four to 56 h later, all animals received 12.5 mg of Lutropin-V (Bioniche) IM and were timed AI (TAI). Dominant follicle diameter was measured on Day 18 and at the time of AI. Pregnancy diagnosis was done by ultrasonography 27 days after AI to compare fertility between groups. Follicle diameter data were analyzed by Student's t -test and pregnancy rate data were compared by the chi-square test. The dominant follicle in the Low-P4 group was larger ( P < 0.05) than in the high-P4 group on the day of the CueMate removal (Day 18) and on the day of the TAI (11.8 ± 0.4 and 13.7 ± 0.5 v . 13.3 ± 0.6 and 15.3 ± 0.6 in the High-P4 and Low-P4 groups, respectively). Pregnancy rate was similar ( P = 0.16) between the groups (High-P4: 55.6% (20/36) and Low-P4: 44.4% (16/33)); however, a larger study is in progress to confirm these results. To conclude, Low-P4 resulted in a larger dominant follicle without any apparent effect on pregnancy rate. The project was funded by Saskatchewan ADF and NSERC. L. Pfeifer is funded through a CAPES scholarship. We acknowledge Schering-Plough and Bioniche for donation of pharmaceuticals .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207