Morphology and rheological properties of polypropylene/reactive elastomer blends
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The relation of morphology to the linear viscoelastic properties for polymer blends consisting of an inert polypropylene and an elastomeric dispersed phase, made of two miscible copolymers, EVA and EMA, was investigated. The rheological properties of the elastomeric phase were modified by crosslinking in presence of an organometallic catalyst. The activation energy for the transesterification reaction taking place between EVA and EMA has been determined by following the increases of the complex viscosity with time and temperature. The Palierne model has been used to describe the linear viscoelastic behavior of the blends, and to estimate the interfacial tension between the immiscible components. The model was shown to describe relatively well the linear viscoelastic properties of reactive and nonreactive blends containing 30% or less elastomer. In parallel, the morphology of reactive and nonreactive blends (i.e. without catalyst in the elastomeric phase), before and after rheological experiments, has been determined using scanning electron microscopy. The size of the dispersed elastomeric particles for reactive blends prepared using an internal mixer was found to be, in most cases, much smaller than that for nonreactive blends.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".