MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Internal magnetic field in the zigzag-chain family (Na,Ca)Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub>

2014· article· en· W2002112721 on OpenAlexafffund
Hiroshi Nozaki, Hiroya Sakurai, Masashi Harada, Yuki Higuchi, J. H. Brewer, Eduardo J. Ansaldo, Jun Sugiyama

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaTRIUMF
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyTRIUMF
KeywordsZigzagChain (unit)Field (mathematics)Condensed matter physicsPhysicsMathematicsGeometryQuantum mechanicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to elucidate the magnetic nature for a novel one-dimensional zigzag chain compound, NaCr2O4, we have measured μ+SR spectra using a powder sample in the temperature range between 2 and 200 K. Weak transverse field (wTF-) μ+SR measurements indicated that the whole volume of the sample enters into an antiferromagnetic (AF) phase below TN = 125 K. The zero field (ZF-) μ+SR spectrum obtained below TN exhibits a clear oscillation with a single muon-spin precession frequency (fμ). This suggests that static AF order is formed below TN and that all the implanted muons sense the same internal magnetic field. The temperature dependence of fμ was found to be very similar to that for the intensity of the magnetic Bragg peak in neutron diffraction (ND) measurements. On the other hand, the ZF-μ+SR spectrum for the isostructural compound, β-CaCr2O4, showed a rapidly damped oscillation below TN = 21 K, supporting the formation of incommensurate AF order, as proposed by ND.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207